Back to homepage
Biohacking · App

The Biohacking AI App that doesn't hallucinate

Every answer backed by 36M+ PubMed papers, A→F evidence tiers and clickable sources. Instead of influencer claims you get what the science actually says — or an honest gap notice when no study exists.

Browse topic worlds
Evidence-based · PubMed-verified

Why most biohacking apps hallucinate

Standard LLMs like ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity weren't built for health. They generate plausible-sounding answers — including non-existent studies, wrong dosages and invented authors. On harmless topics it's annoying; on supplements, dosages or interactions it can be dangerous. Studies show ChatGPT hallucinates non-existent source citations in 20-40 % of medical queries. Most "biohacking apps" in the App Store are thin ChatGPT wrappers with a health prompt on top — same hallucination risk, just nicer packaging. Anyone asking "NMN dosage for 45-year-old men" gets a confidently worded recommendation with no real source and no safety disclaimer.

What an evidence-based biohacking app must deliver

A serious biohacking app meets four requirements: first, every answer with a clickable primary source (PubMed ID, DOI, full-text link); second, evidence rating per study (meta-analysis > RCT > cohort > anecdote); third, explicit gap notification when studies are insufficient — instead of inventing answers; fourth, study freshness, meaning live PubMed access rather than a frozen training date from two years ago. Biohacking AI meets all four: the app searches 36M+ papers live, assigns A→F evidence tiers, flags limited evidence explicitly and provides clickable PubMed links for every claim. The underlying mechanism blocks free generation — the model may only cite from verified sources.

Features: Study chat, Deep Research, topic worlds

The app offers three main modes. (1) Study chat: ask a question, get an evidence-based answer with 5-10 cited studies in seconds. (2) Deep Research: for complex questions the AI creates a full-text report with 50+ sources, organized by mechanism, study evidence and practical application. (3) Topic worlds: curated entry hubs for sleep, longevity, supplements, performance, recovery and seven additional areas — each with the most robust studies as required reading. The web app runs in any browser without installation; a native iOS app is in beta. All answers stay saved in your account, so you can share, export or roll them into your own stack dossiers later.

Evidence, not hallucination

Evidence-based biohacking — how we rank studies

Evidence-based biohacking means every claim about sleep, supplements, longevity or performance stands or falls with the study it cites. Biohacking AI makes that study trail visible — with clickable PubMed links, transparent evidence tiers and honest labeling where research is still thin. Every biohacker should know whether they're following a meta-analysis or a mouse paper.

Meta-analysis & systematic review

Pooled RCTs — the most robust evidence we can find in biohacking topics. Examples: creatine monohydrate for strength output, NMN for plasma NAD+ levels.

Randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Gold standard for single studies. Causal claims are possible, but effect sizes vary widely. Examples: magnesium for cramps, ashwagandha for cortisol-driven stress.

Observational / cohort study

Large population data, but no causality — useful hypothesis generators. Examples: vitamin D levels and mortality, sleep duration and dementia risk.

Mechanistic & animal model

Plausibility yes, clinical proof no. We label this transparently so no one reads a mouse result as "proven." Examples: peptides like BPC-157, red-light therapy at the cell level.

Those four tiers underpin every answer on the platform — no study is cited without a tier label, and when the evidence is thin the AI says so openly.

Read more in the Basics world

Topic worlds

Ten worlds for biohackers — from sleep to longevity

Instead of chat roulette with ChatGPT, biohackers get curated worlds here — each with its own study base, substance set and protocols. Click in and see what the research says about your topic — from a magnesium stack through NMN to cold exposure.

Browse all ten worlds
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which biohacking app is trustworthy?
A biohacking app is trustworthy if it meets three criteria: first, clickable primary sources (PubMed ID/DOI) for every claim; second, transparent evidence rating (meta-analysis > RCT > cohort); third, honest gap notification on thin evidence instead of invented answers. Apps that just surface ChatGPT answers without this source verification aren't trustworthy — regardless of how polished the UI looks.
Which biohacking app uses real PubMed studies?
Biohacking AI is one of the few apps that verifies every answer against the PubMed database — live access to 36M+ papers, not a frozen training snapshot. Standard LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini only have PubMed knowledge indirectly from their training date and can't cite current studies. The app blocks free generation and forces the model to answer only from PubMed hits.
Does the Biohacking AI app cost anything?
The basics (study chat, topic worlds, blog) are free and testable without an account. Advanced features like Deep Research, personal stack dossiers and export options run on a simple freemium model. There are no hidden health-coach fees and no affiliate contracts with supplement brands.
Is there an iOS app or only a browser version?
The web app runs in any modern browser on iOS, Android, macOS, Windows and Linux — no install required. A native iOS app is in beta and integrates Apple Intelligence as well as WidgetKit for daily study highlights on the home screen.
How is the app different from ChatGPT for health questions?
ChatGPT generates freely and hallucinates non-existent source citations in 20-40 % of medical queries. Biohacking AI blocks free generation and only lets the model cite from real PubMed hits. The result: shorter, more cautious answers — but with clickable sources and no invented studies. When no evidence exists, the app says so explicitly instead of inventing a plausible story.
What topics does the app cover?
The app covers ten curated topic worlds: sleep, longevity, hormones, peptides, cognition, performance, recovery, mental health, supplements and methods (cold, sauna, red light, breathwork, fasting). Within each world you find the most robust studies, curated stack recommendations and a direct study chat for the topic.
Related

Biohacking without hallucinations — every answer with a source

Ask your first question and see what an answer with a clickable PubMed source looks like. Free, no account needed.